Postface#
Note
Source Code: teach_online/postface.md
Thank you again for reading How to Teach Online! I sincerely hope you gained some useful information that you can incorporate into your own teaching, and if you think of anything you want to contribute, please feel free to create a Pull Request on GitHub!
Executable Books Community. Jupyter Book. February 2020. URL: https://zenodo.org/record/2561065 (visited on 2024-04-13), doi:10.5281/ZENODO.2561065.
Jacob Bishop and Matthew Verleger. The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of the Research. In 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 23.1200.1–23.1200.18. Atlanta, Georgia, June 2013. ASEE Conferences. URL: http://peer.asee.org/22585 (visited on 2024-04-05), doi:10.18260/1-2--22585.
Gökçe Akçayır and Murat Akçayır. The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges. Computers & Education, 126:334–345, November 2018. URL: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360131518302045 (visited on 2024-04-05), doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.021.
Phillip Compeau. Establishing a computational biology flipped classroom. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(5):e1006764, May 2019. URL: https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006764 (visited on 2024-04-05), doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006764.
Catherine H. Crouch and Eric Mazur. Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9):970–977, September 2001. URL: https://pubs.aip.org/ajp/article/69/9/970/310529/Peer-Instruction-Ten-years-of-experience-and (visited on 2024-04-04), doi:10.1119/1.1374249.
Jennifer K. Knight and Cynthia J. Brame. Peer Instruction. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(2):fe5, June 2018. URL: https://www.lifescied.org/doi/10.1187/cbe.18-02-0025 (visited on 2024-04-04), doi:10.1187/cbe.18-02-0025.
Leo Porter, Cynthia Bailey Lee, and Beth Simon. Halving fail rates using peer instruction: a study of four computer science courses. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, 177–182. Denver Colorado USA, March 2013. ACM. URL: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2445196.2445250 (visited on 2024-04-04), doi:10.1145/2445196.2445250.
Elizabeth G. Cohen. Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1):1–35, March 1994. URL: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/00346543064001001 (visited on 2024-04-05), doi:10.3102/00346543064001001.
Philip H. Pollock, Kerstin Hamann, and Bruce M. Wilson. Learning Through Discussions: Comparing the Benefits of Small-Group and Large-Class Settings. Journal of Political Science Education, 7(1):48–64, February 2011. URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15512169.2011.539913 (visited on 2024-04-04), doi:10.1080/15512169.2011.539913.
Judith Bennett, Sylvia Hogarth, Fred Lubben, Bob Campbell, and Alison Robinson. Talking Science: The research evidence on the use of small group discussions in science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 32(1):69–95, January 2010. URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09500690802713507 (visited on 2024-04-04), doi:10.1080/09500690802713507.
Zachary P. Gersten and Olivia S. Anderson. Barriers and Facilitators for Attending In-Person Classes as Identified by Public Health Undergraduate Students Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic. College Teaching, pages 1–7, March 2023. URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/87567555.2023.2185763 (visited on 2024-04-05), doi:10.1080/87567555.2023.2185763.
Adrian Salguero, William G. Griswold, Christine Alvarado, and Leo Porter. Understanding Sources of Student Struggle in Early Computer Science Courses. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, 319–333. Virtual Event USA, August 2021. ACM. URL: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3446871.3469755 (visited on 2024-04-05), doi:10.1145/3446871.3469755.
Christine Alvarado, Mia Minnes, and Leo Porter. Micro-Classes: A Structure for Improving Student Experience in Large Classes. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 21–26. Seattle Washington USA, March 2017. ACM. URL: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3017680.3017727 (visited on 2024-04-05), doi:10.1145/3017680.3017727.
Brian J Beatty. Transitioning to an Online World: Using HyFlex Courses to Bridge the Gap. In Craig Montgomerie and Jane Seale, editors, Proceedings of EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2007, 2701–2706. Vancouver, Canada, June 2007. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). URL: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/25752.
Brian Beatty. Hybrid-Flexible Course Design. EdTech Books, 1 edition, 2019. URL: https://edtechbooks.org/hyflex (visited on 2024-04-10), doi:10.59668/33.
Philip J. Guo, Juho Kim, and Rob Rubin. How video production affects student engagement: an empirical study of MOOC videos. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning @ scale conference, 41–50. Atlanta Georgia USA, March 2014. ACM. URL: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2556325.2566239 (visited on 2024-04-18), doi:10.1145/2556325.2566239.
Anna Hansch, Lisa Hillers, Katherine McConachie, Christopher Newman, Thomas Schildhauer, and Philipp Schmidt. Video and Online Learning: Critical Reflections and Findings from the Field. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2015. URL: http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=2577882 (visited on 2024-04-18), doi:10.2139/ssrn.2577882.
Phillip Compeau and Pavel A. Pevzner. Life after MOOCs. Communications of the ACM, 58(10):41–44, September 2015. URL: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2686871 (visited on 2024-04-18), doi:10.1145/2686871.
Ahmad Manasrah, Mohammad Masoud, and Yousef Jaradat. Short Videos, or Long Videos? A Study on the Ideal Video Length in Online Learning. In 2021 International Conference on Information Technology (ICIT), 366–370. Amman, Jordan, July 2021. IEEE. URL: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9491115/ (visited on 2024-04-18), doi:10.1109/ICIT52682.2021.9491115.
Mia Minnes, Christine Alvarado, Max Geislinger, and Joyce Fang. Podcast Highlights: Targeted Educational Videos From Repurposed Lecture-capture Footage. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 365–371. Minneapolis MN USA, February 2019. ACM. URL: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3287324.3287465 (visited on 2024-04-18), doi:10.1145/3287324.3287465.
Charles C. Bonwell and James A. Eison. Active learning: creating excitement in the classroom. Number 1, 1991 in ASHE-ERIC higher education report. School of Education and Human Development, George Washington University, Washington, DC, 1991. ISBN 978-1-878380-08-1.
Darren Turnbull, Ritesh Chugh, and Jo Luck. Learning Management Systems, An Overview. In Arthur Tatnall, editor, Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies, pages 1052–1058. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2020. URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_248 (visited on 2024-04-07), doi:10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_248.
Sarah Elaine Eaton, editor. Second handbook of academic integrity. Springer, Cham, [second edition] edition, 2024. ISBN 978-3-031-54144-5. OCLC: 1423506281.
Phillip Dawson. Remote Proctoring: Understanding the Debate. In Sarah Elaine Eaton, editor, Second Handbook of Academic Integrity, pages 1511–1526. Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2024. URL: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-54144-5_150 (visited on 2024-04-11), doi:10.1007/978-3-031-54144-5_150.
Nancy J. Stone. Understanding Learning Environments, Personality, and Proctoring During Mandatory Remote Delivery. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 65(1):767–770, September 2021. URL: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1071181321651325 (visited on 2024-04-11), doi:10.1177/1071181321651325.
Rianne Conijn, Ad Kleingeld, Uwe Matzat, and Chris Snijders. The fear of big brother: The potential negative side‐effects of proctored exams. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(6):1521–1534, December 2022. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.12651 (visited on 2024-04-11), doi:10.1111/jcal.12651.
Neil Selwyn, Chris O’Neill, Gavin Smith, Mark Andrejevic, and Xin Gu. A necessary evil? The rise of online exam proctoring in Australian universities. Media International Australia, 186(1):149–164, February 2023. URL: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1329878X211005862 (visited on 2024-04-11), doi:10.1177/1329878X211005862.
Ouadie Akaaboune, Leslie H. Blix, Linda G. Carrington, and Cassy D. Henderson. Accountability in Distance Learning: The Effect of Remote Proctoring on Performance in Online Accounting Courses. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 19(1):121–131, March 2022. URL: https://publications.aaahq.org/jeta/article/19/1/121/150/Accountability-in-Distance-Learning-The-Effect-of (visited on 2024-04-11), doi:10.2308/JETA-2020-040.
Helaine M Alessio, Nancy Malay, Karsten Maurer, A John Bailer, and Beth Rubin. Examining the effect of proctoring on online test scores. Online Learning, 21(1):146–161, 2017. Publisher: ERIC.
Jane Carstairs and Brett Myors. Internet testing: A natural experiment reveals test score inflation on a high-stakes, unproctored cognitive test. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(3):738–742, May 2009. URL: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0747563209000260 (visited on 2024-04-11), doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.01.011.
Ann Boyd Davis, Richard Rand, and Robert Seay. Remote Proctoring: The Effect of Proctoring on Grades. In Timothy J. Rupert and Beth B. Kern, editors, Advances in Accounting Education, volume 18, pages 23–50. Emerald Group Publishing Limited., January 2016. URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S1085-462220160000018002/full/html (visited on 2024-04-11), doi:10.1108/S1085-462220160000018002.
Seife Dendir and R. Stockton Maxwell. Cheating in online courses: Evidence from online proctoring. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 2:100033, August 2020. URL: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2451958820300336 (visited on 2024-04-11), doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100033.
Oskar R. Harmon and James Lambrinos. Are Online Exams an Invitation to Cheat? The Journal of Economic Education, 39(2):116–125, April 2008. URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3200/JECE.39.2.116-125 (visited on 2024-04-11), doi:10.3200/JECE.39.2.116-125.
Michael N. Karim, Samuel E. Kaminsky, and Tara S. Behrend. Cheating, Reactions, and Performance in Remotely Proctored Testing: An Exploratory Experimental Study. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(4):555–572, December 2014. URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10869-014-9343-z (visited on 2024-04-11), doi:10.1007/s10869-014-9343-z.
Timothy H Reisenwitz. Examining the necessity of proctoring online exams. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 2020.
Patriel Stapleton and Jeremiah Blanchard. Remote Proctoring: Expanding Reliability and Trust. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 1243–1243. Virtual Event USA, March 2021. ACM. URL: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3408877.3439671 (visited on 2024-04-11), doi:10.1145/3408877.3439671.
Ben Burgess, Avi Ginsberg, Edward W. Felten, and Shaanan Cohney. Watching the watchers: bias and vulnerability in remote proctoring software. In 31st USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 22), 571–588. Boston, MA, August 2022. USENIX Association. URL: https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity22/presentation/burgess.
Laura Bergmans, Nacir Bouali, Marloes Luttikhuis, and Arend Rensink. On the Efficacy of Online Proctoring using Proctorio. In Beno Csapó and James Uhomoibhi, editors, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU 2021), volume 1, 279–290. SCITEPRESS, 2021. URL: https://csedu.scitevents.org/?y=2021, doi:10.5220/0010399602790290.
Thomas Langenfeld. Internet‐Based Proctored Assessment: Security and Fairness Issues. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 39(3):24–27, September 2020. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emip.12359 (visited on 2024-04-12), doi:10.1111/emip.12359.
Phillip Dawson. Defending Assessment Security in a Digital World: Preventing E-Cheating and Supporting Academic Integrity in Higher Education. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2021., 1 edition, October 2020. ISBN 978-0-429-32417-8. URL: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781000201000 (visited on 2024-04-12), doi:10.4324/9780429324178.
Niema Moshiri. A scalable approach for detecting exam similarity in CS courses. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 37(10):8–16, April 2022. URL: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/3533760.3533761, doi:10.5555/3533760.3533761.
Ruiwei Xiao, Eduardo Huerta-Mercado, and Dan Garcia. Detecting Cheating in Online Take-Home Exams with Randomized Questions. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2, 1323–1323. Toronto ON Canada, March 2022. ACM. URL: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3545947.3576270 (visited on 2024-04-19), doi:10.1145/3545947.3576270.
Saul Schleimer, Daniel S. Wilkerson, and Alex Aiken. Winnowing: local algorithms for document fingerprinting. In Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, 76–85. San Diego California, June 2003. ACM. URL: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/872757.872770 (visited on 2024-04-13), doi:10.1145/872757.872770.
Robert J. Beichner. History and Evolution of Active Learning Spaces. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2014(137):9–16, March 2014. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tl.20081 (visited on 2024-04-23), doi:10.1002/tl.20081.
J. Jacob Jenkins, Luis A. Sánchez, Megan A. K. Schraedley, Jaime Hannans, Nitzan Navick, and Jade Young. Textbook Broke: Textbook Affordability as a Social Justice Issue. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2020(1):3, May 2020. URL: https://jime.open.ac.uk/article/10.5334/jime.549/ (visited on 2024-04-07), doi:10.5334/jime.549.
Thahomina Jahan Nipa and Sharareh Kermanshachi. Assessment of open educational resources (OER) developed in interactive learning environments. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4):2521–2547, July 2020. URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10639-019-10081-7 (visited on 2024-04-07), doi:10.1007/s10639-019-10081-7.
Gráinne Conole. Fostering social inclusion through open educational resources (OER). Distance Education, 33(2):131–134, August 2012. URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01587919.2012.700563 (visited on 2024-04-07), doi:10.1080/01587919.2012.700563.